Make a difference

Share

If you don’t have anything already scheduled for “Make a Difference Day,” please consider helping with the renovation of a Warren city home that is being funded by the Trumbull 100. You can just show up between 9:00 a.m and 4:00 p.m. to clear the outside of overgrown vegetation with volunteer Bob Hoy, or to work inside with Trumbull 100 volunteer Shari Harrell, who will be cleaning and painting.

“One of my goals as president of Trumbull 100 is the repopulation of Warren, to stop the decline of the central city and to get people to move back into the neighborhoods,” Diane Sauer said as she stood in the living room of the home, located at 1165 High St. N.E. (IMPORTANT: The house is on the part of High Street that is disconnected from the downtown High Street. You can get to the house by turning west off of Laird Avenue and driving down two blocks.)

Check it out: 1165 High St NE – Google Maps) It’s a nice looking house and a nice neighborhood with sidewalks and porches where you can say hello and get to know your neighbors.

Diane’s husband, Kurt, who is an engineer says the house is in need of a furnace, roof repairs, a hot water tank, some plumbing, kitchen cabinets, bathroom fixtures and a small amount of electrical upgrades to the kitchen and bathroom. Diane is hoping to get additional donations of materials. If anyone has questions or wants to donate time or materials please call her at 330-373-1600.

Once the work is completed the house will be sold at a very affordable price to an owner occupant.

(This post borrowed heavily from the Tribune. We’d rather just link to their articles occasionally, but since they no longer allow non-subscribers to read articles online we crib a little now and then. We always credit them and tell ourselves this is a good thing for them. Buy the Tribune. It’s good for the community.)

Comments Off

We love you, but…

Share

Magazine CutoutsWe’ve spent the past few years attending meeting after meeting here, often wondering if there was any political issue that could possibly bring out any passion from local residents. Who would have guessed that passion would finally be released yesterday at a hearing of the planning commission to consider a zoning variance request. Sometimes Warren will surprise you.

The issue is this: The Warren Family Mission (WFM) bought the old Christ Our King Church on Tod Avenue SW at auction last year, with the intention of making it a shelter primarily for for woman and children. Many of the church’s neighbors in the 6th Ward were against the idea from the beginning and have only become more opposed as  WFM expanded the scope of its plans to include serving homeless people and people with disabilities — including alcoholics and drug users.

More than 75 people packed Council Chambers as Mayor Franklin, Enzo Cantalamessa and the three private citizens who make up the planning commission heard arguments for and against WFM’s plans and variance request #14-05. (The Tribune has a good write up by Raymond Smith this morning for more details.) The crowd was mostly older and mostly African-American, reflecting the 6th Ward neighborhood’s demographics.

The “opposed” spoke first and a dozen speakers expressed their feelings, which can be summarized as follows:

“The mission is a good thing, we support the mission, but we do not want it in our neighborhood. Our neighborhood already has too many problems with disrespectful kids, loud music, drugs, and crime. That building is too close to Jefferson Elementary School and the people who will patronize it represent a risk to the kids. Having this in our neighborhood will lower our already depressed property values. Put it someplace else.

The anti-group was led by 6th Ward Councilwoman Cheryl Saffold who gave a fiery speech in opposition, reminding the commission that she had been fighting the WFM plans for more than a year and had presented a petition with more than 500 signatures in opposition.

It was a strong and emotional presentation from the opposition forces, but it was just the beginning. WFM supporters were no less emotional nor less numerous in number, and it was now their turn. They too had more than a dozen speakers in support including several former clients helped by the mission. One man talked of having put a gun to his head in desperation for his condition in life before the mission saved him. Several single mothers talked about how the WFM was the only thing that saved them and their children from homelessness.

The final two speakers summarized the WFM position. Pastor Chris Gilger said he quit a government job with benefits in 1998 to start the mission, despite have 6 kids and no benefits in his new venture. He then used $43,000 of his own money to to keep the mission going the first two years. He reminded the crowd that with every facility the mission has opened, crime has gone down in the surrounding neighborhood. He reminded the opposition that they like the good the mission does and that they should understand that,

“We aren’t going to bring crime and criminals and trouble to your neighborhood; we are bringing help for the troubled and the troubles that are already there.”

Gilger claimed that according to public records, 180 registered sex offenders currently live in the 6th Ward, and “We didn’t put them there, but maybe we can show them a different path in life.”

The final speaker was Attorney Gil Rucker, who made the legal case in support, siting the Federal Fair Housing Act and a couple of Supreme Court decisions that, to the layman, sounded very persuasive on the side of WFM. Rucker reminded the crowd that it was not many years ago that arguments similar to those presented by the WFM’s opposition were used to keep blacks and other minorities from living in certain places. “We’re all for them — just not in our neighborhood. They will bring down property values and bring crime to our neighborhoods.” We remember hearing those same arguments back in the ’60′s and even later. If this goes to the courts we would not want to have to defend those kind of arguments. If the variance is denied and WFM sues the city it could result in an expensive round of court costs. Money Warren does not have. The city is already in court fighting an attempt to operate a group home for recovering addicts on the NE side in a neighborhood that is not zoned for such use.

That seems to be the issue most concerning the planning commission, which voted 4-1 to table the request pending a legal opinion from the Warren Law Department.

The Mayor, who must at least appear to be neutral as he sits as a judge in this matter, became visibly emotional during his summary when talking about his own son who suffers from certain disabilities. We wish for him the courage to do the right thing. Both Councilwoman Saffold and Councilwoman-at-large Helen Rucker spoke in opposition of the WFM plan. The opposition are the kind of people who never miss a vote — or an opportunity to remind politicians that they vote.

No politician spoke for the Warren Family Mission. The homeless and the hungry are less likely to vote, we guess.

Comments Off

Follow-ups

Share

FOLLOW-UP1We emailed Mayor Franklin and Saftey Service Director Cantalamessa last Thursday afternoon asking for a comment on the situation at Austin Village Plaza, but did not receive a response. We never do, but so many people have asked us what their position is on the demolition, we tried again.

Slow progress continues at the site. It remains difficult to be optimistic that the work will be completed by November 30 — the city deadline — but at least they are there working some part of most days.

There is more to this story than just the demolition of the buildings. The owners have an interesting use in mind for the property once it has been cleared. Joe Shafran, the C.E.O. of Paran Management confirmed to us that he hopes to build a windmill farm on the property, which would generate electricity that could be sold to local businesses. Like most energy projects, this idea in predicated on the ability to qualify for certain tax credits or incentives. We know he has been working to gain political support for the project from Congressman Tim Ryan, Mayor Franklin and 7th Ward Councilman Eddie Colbert.

We’d love to add our support to the wind farm idea, and if Shafran would only quit diddling around and finish the demo we’d get in the parade.

*   *   *

We were disappointed that the Tribune elected not to publish our letter regarding their recent and inflated “crime wave” story on Sunday. We know how hard the newspaper business is, and no paper gets it right every time. Warren would be much worse off without the Tribune’s contribution to local information. Howver, we thought the story deserved a more critical look at the statistics than it received, so we are posting it again below.

Dear Editor,

Your October 5, 2014 front page story “Crime Wave Has Residents on Alert” was misleading and a disservice to your readers.

The article’s headline gives the impression that violent crime has recently spiked in Warren. To make the case the Tribune identified 14 violent crimes that took place in the city in September as evidence. Calling this a “crime wave” suggests a recent and dramatic increase, which the facts do not support.

According to FBI Uniform Crime Statistics, Warren reported 279 violent crimes in 2012 (the last year for which data is available), or just over 23 per month. So unless there were two or three times as many incidents in September beyond those you reported, no such increase took place.

Moreover, violent crime in Warren has been dropping steadily since 2006 when 696 were reported (17 per thousand); a decrease of nearly 60% over six years.

The 2012 violent crime rate per 1000 population was 6.8; that is fifty percent, or more, lower than the violent crime rates in Youngstown, Canton, Akron, Cleveland, Toledo or Cincinnati.

Fear of crime stops few people from going to Cleveland to a ball game or to dinner in Youngstown. But we hear many local suburban people say that fear of crime keeps them from coming into Warren.

We can all agree that one crime is too many, and that crime must be taken seriously. It is a  problem in Warren — as it is in nearly every American city. However, stories like this one unnecessarily frighten residents and seriously diminish the image of Warren as a place to live and work.

Dennis Blank
Publisher, Warren Expressed
 

 

Comments Off

Notes from inside the bubble

Share

inside_the_bubble_by_cath_ong-d6eaymvPolitics in Warren is very much an insider’s game. There aren’t very many seats at the table, and like any game, it has its own rules and vocabulary. The vocabulary, in particular, makes it very hard for outsiders to even follow what their elected officials are up to as the very particular and arcane words and phrases, that no one else uses ever, are very hard to translate into common English. Whatever their purpose, they do a good job of disguising reality.

Last night at City Council meeting, this clear-as-mud little item came up for a vote; “in title only” it read:

“An ordinance for the purpose of: appropriating from the unappropriated, unencumbered balance of the General Funds; and appropriating from the unappropriated, unencumbered balance of certain city funds; and appropriating from the unappropriated, anticipated revenue of various city funds and declaring an emergency.”

While we were not there last night we were told there was no meaningful discussion and the bill passed 10-0. So this language must mean something to somebody — the alternative being that our council people voted for something they didn’t understand either.

Also, are there any English teachers out there? Can you have a colon plus two semi-colons in one sentence?

There was not much on the City Council agenda last evening, but they also passed a proclamation honoring Chris Stevenson, the new city grant writer, for his previous service to Packard Music Hall. Local political pundit Josh Nativio commented on this on Facebook in his usual caring and sensitive way, which drew rebukes from Enzo Cantalamessa and Jim Fogarty. We think Josh got it right. See why here. Sometimes we think Josh should be writing this column as he is definitely more entertaining. If you want to see what he had to say about last night’s council meeting visit his Facebook page.

Comments Off

What’s wrong with this picture?

Share

DSCN0911We last talked to Joe Shafran, the CEO of Paran Management, owners of Austin Village Plaza, about two weeks ago. In that conversation he promised that starting the next day, the demolition crew would be at work every weekday from 7:30 a.m. until 4:00 and that the building would be down and gone by mid-October. A week later the deadline had slid to November 30. We stopped in at AVP about 11:30 yesterday and the same time today, and no one was working either day. The photo above was taken today — we aren’t reusing photos from a few weeks ago; but scroll back and look at those first AVP posts and you tell us how much progress has been made. The 6′ weeds have not been mowed yet either.

Our big fear is this: Shafran is the father-in-law of Ohio Secretary of State Josh Mandel, who is running for reelection in November. Since there is no evidence that Shafran is taking his promises to remove this blight on Warren in a timely fashion, is it possible he is stringing us along until the election is over? Imagine how lovely this mountain of debris will look when no weed cover is left and the parking lot is a frozen, barren moat surrounding Shafran Castle.

We called Shafran yesterday and called his appointed representative today to get their comments; neither returned the calls.

So even if you’ve called or written already, let him know again that we are watching the progress at AVP — or we would be if there was any.

teaserbox_4089642829Joseph Shafran, CEO
Paran Management Company
2720 Van Aken Blvd. #200
Cleveland, Ohio 44120
216-921-5663
jshafran@paranmgt.com
Comments Off